Passage
Acts 17.27-28
27. that they should seek God, if haply they might feel after him and find him, though he is not far from each one of us: 28. for in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain even of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring. (ASV)Book: Acts · ASV / WEB / KJV / YLT
Immediate context (±2 verses)
ASV
25. neither is he served by men's hands, as though he needed anything, seeing he himself giveth to all life, and breath, and all things; 26. and he made of one every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed seasons, and the bounds of their habitation;
27. that they should seek God, if haply they might feel after him and find him, though he is not far from each one of us: 28. for in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain even of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.
- Being then the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and device of man. 30. The times of ignorance therefore God overlooked; but now he commandeth men that they should all everywhere repent: (Acts 17:25-30, ASV)
WEB
25. neither is he served by men’s hands, as though he needed anything, seeing he himself gives to all life and breath, and all things. 26. He made from one blood every nation of men to dwell on all the surface of the earth, having determined appointed seasons, and the boundaries of their dwellings,
27. that they should seek the Lord, if perhaps they might reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from each one of us. 28. ‘For in him we live, and move, and have our being.’ As some of your own poets have said, ‘For we are also his offspring.’
- Being then the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Divine Nature is like gold, or silver, or stone, engraved by art and design of man. 30. The times of ignorance therefore God overlooked. But now he commands that all people everywhere should repent, (Acts 17:25-30, WEB)
KJV
25. Neither is worshipped with men's hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things; 26. And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation;
27. That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us: 28. For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring.
- Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and man's device. 30. And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent: (Acts 17:25-30, KJV)
YLT
25. neither by the hands of men is He served, needing anything, He giving to all life, and breath, and all things; 26. He made also of one blood every nation of men, to dwell upon all the face of the earth, having ordained times before appointed, and the bounds of their dwellings
27. to seek the Lord, if perhaps they did feel after Him and find,, though, indeed, He is not far from each one of us, 28. for in Him we live, and move, and are; as also certain of your poets have said: For of Him also we are offspring.
- 'Being, therefore, offspring of God, we ought not to think the Godhead to be like to gold, or silver, or stone, graving of art and device of man; 30. the times, indeed, therefore, of the ignorance God having overlooked, doth now command all men everywhere to reform, (Acts 17:25-30, YLT)
See this page's graph and discover linked topics
Setting
- Speaker: Paul, addressing the Areopagus (17:22)
- Audience: the Athenians who brought him there, including Epicurean and Stoic philosophers (17:18-21), with the council of the Areopagus
- Location: the Areopagus at Athens; the name belonged both to the hill of Ares northwest of the Acropolis and to the ancient council that took its name from it, and which of the two Luke means is debated
- Time period: c. AD 50, on Paul's second missionary journey, shortly before his eighteen months in Corinth (Acts 18:11)
Theological reading
"That they should seek God, if haply they might feel after him and find him, though he is not far from each one of us: for in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain even of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring." These verses are the center of Paul's argument from creation.
Groping toward God. "Feel after" (Strong's G5584) is a word for touching or handling, used of the disciples handling the risen Jesus (Luke 24:39) and of the apostles' hands that "handled" the Word of life (1 John 1:1). Here it pictures someone reaching in the dark. Human seeking is real, and uncertain: "if haply."
Not far. The reason seeking is possible is that God is near: "he is not far from each one of us." The next clause explains why: "in him we live, and move, and have our being." Every human life, motion and existence is held in being by God. This is not the Stoic claim that we are parts of God. Paul has just said that God made the world and is its Lord (17:24). The nearness is that of a Maker who sustains what he made, not of a whole to its parts. See Argument from the Continuance of Being and Panentheism.
The poets. "For we are also his offspring" is a line from Aratus of Soli, a third-century BC poet (Phaenomena 5). The line originally referred to Zeus. Paul introduces it with "certain even of your own poets," in the plural, which suggests he is citing a thought found in more than one Greek writer. The source of the first line, "in him we live, and move, and have our being," is debated.
Using a pagan poet. Paul does not endorse Zeus. He takes a true observation that Greek poets made, that human beings stand in a relation of origin and dependence to God, and gives it its proper object. The conclusion he draws in the next verse is one the poets did not: if we are God's offspring, the divine cannot be represented by gold or stone (17:29). See Natural Theology.
Key words
Theologically-loaded Greek or Hebrew words in this verse may have entries in the lexicon. Curated to roughly 100 contested terms across the corpus, not every word; see Lexicon Roadmap.
- G5584 - pselaphao, pselaphao, Strong's G5584
- G2198 - zao, zao, Strong's G2198
- G1520 - heis, heis, Strong's G1520
- G2962 - kyrios, kyrios, Strong's G2962
Quoted in
Arguments and defeaters:
- Accident of Birth Objection Defeater, via Acts 17.26-27
- Agnostic Retreat Defeater, via Acts 17.27
- Anthropology Defeats Christianity Objection Defeater, via Acts 17.27, Acts 17.28
- Anthropology vs Epistemology Priority Objection Defeater, via Acts 17.28
- Aquinas Five Ways, via Acts 17.28
- Argument from Awe and Wonder
- Argument from Consciousness, via Acts 17.28
- Argument from Human Exceptionalism, via Acts 17.26-27
- Argument from Intelligibility, via Acts 17.28
- Argument from Purpose Meaning and Hope, via Acts 17.26-28
- Argument from Religious Experience, via Acts 17.27
- Argument from the Continuance of Being, via Acts 17.28
- Argument from the Demand to Be Witnessed
- Argument from the Mirror-Recognition Convergence, via Acts 17.28
- Argument from the Observer-Demand Convergence, via Acts 17.28
- Atheist Self-Identity Dilemma, via Acts 17.22-31, Acts 17.28
- Bayesian Argument for Theism, via Acts 17.27
- Build the Cosmological Argument, via Acts 17.24-28
- Cant Prove a Negative Objection Defeater, via Acts 17.28
- Cartesian Skeptical Argument and Christian Responses
- Christian God is the Only True God, via Acts 17.24-28
- Christians Destroyed Ancient Learning Objection Defeater, via Acts 17.28
- Christians Destroyed Pagan Temples Objection Defeater, via Acts 17.22-31
- Contingency Argument, via Acts 17.24-28, Acts 17.28
- Define the God You Deny (Debate Traps)
- Deism vs the Christian God, via Acts 17.27
- Epistemology Defeats Christianity Objection Defeater, via Acts 17.28
- Evil God Objection Defeater, via Acts 17.26-27
- Fine-Tuning Argument, via Acts 17.24-28
- First Way - Motion, via Acts 17.28
- Genesis ANE Myth Borrowing Objection Defeater, via Acts 17.22-31
- Gentiles Cannot Be Saved Objection Defeater, via Acts 17.22-31, Acts 17.26-27
- God Cannot Exist Outside Time Objection Defeater, via Acts 17.28
- God Is the Eternal Atoms Objection Defeater, via Acts 17.28
- God of the Gaps Objection Defeater, via Acts 17.26-28
- Hand of God Argument, via Acts 17.28
- Inference to the Best Explanation in Bio Origins Argument, via Acts 17.24-28
- Meta-Ontological Argument for Theism, via Acts 17.28
- Methodological Naturalism Critique, via Acts 17.24-28
- Mythicism Refutation, via Acts 17.16-34
- Necessary Being is an Intelligent Mind, via Acts 17.24-28, Acts 17.28
- New Age Spirituality vs the Christian God
- OT Polytheism Objection Defeater, via Acts 17.22-31
- Pantheism vs the Christian God, via Acts 17.28
- Perfection Argument, via Acts 17.28
- Problem of Evil, Free Will Defense, via Acts 17.26-28
- Second Way - Efficient Causality, via Acts 17.24-28, Acts 17.28
- Stealing from God Argument, via Acts 17.28
- The Common Room Argument, via Acts 17.26-28
- The Lock and Key Argument, via Acts 17.26-27, Acts 17.27
- The Unbroken Whole Argument, via Acts 17.28
- Transcendental Argument for God, via Acts 17.28
Concepts:
- African Traditional Deities (Demonic), via Acts 17.22-31
- Apologetics, via Acts 17.16-34
- Apologist, via Acts 17.16-34
- Aseity, via Acts 17.28
- Concurrentism, via Acts 17.28
- Conservation Laws, via Acts 17.28
- Cosmic Dictator Objection, via Acts 17.28
- Doctrine
- Evangelism, via Acts 17.22-31
- General Revelation, via Acts 17.22-31, Acts 17.26-27
- God is Impossible Paradox Cluster, via Acts 17.24-28
- Gospel, via Acts 17.24-28
- Innate Knowledge of God, via Acts 17.22-31
- Is Atheism a Religion, via Acts 17.22-31
- Laws of the Universe as Witness to Design, via Acts 17.28
- Lesson 1.2, The Biblical Charge, via Acts 17.16-34
- Lesson 5.1, The Apologist-to-Evangelist Transition, via Acts 17, Acts 17.16-34
- Methodological Naturalism, via Acts 17.28
- Natural Theology, via Acts 17.22-31, Acts 17.24-28
- New Age Spiritualism, via Acts 17.28
- Occasionalism, via Acts 17.28
- Panentheism, via Acts 17.28
- Pantheism, via Acts 17.28
- Polytheism, via Acts 17.16-34
- Preaching to Non-Believers
- Priority Monism, via Acts 17.28
- Quick Objection Responses, via Acts 17.27
- Religious Pluralism Objection, via Acts 17.22-28
- Salvation of the Unevangelized, via Acts 17.23-31, Acts 17.27
- Seeking God, via Acts 17.22-31, Acts 17.27
- Sensus Divinitatis, via Acts 17.22-31
- Spiritual But Not Religious
- The Muslim Defense, via Acts 17.28
- Zeitgeist - Pagan Parallels, via Acts 17.22-34
People:
Lexicon:
- G1510 - eimi, via Acts 17.28
- G2305 - theiotes, via Acts 17.26-28
- G3962 - pater, via Acts 17.28-29
- G5020 - tartaroo, via Acts 17.28
- G5584 - pselaphao, via Acts 17.27
Guides:
- 01 Foundations, via Acts 17.16-34
- 03 Arguments for God, via Acts 17
- Ris3n Arguments, via Acts 17.26-27
Why these four translations
ris3n chose ASV, WEB, KJV, and YLT for two reasons together. They are the most literal English translations available (formal-equivalence: word-for-word renderings that preserve the Hebrew and Greek grammar rather than smoothing it into modern dynamic-equivalence idiom). And they are in the public domain in the United States, which means fair-use quotation at any length requires no publisher license. Modern licensed translations (NASB95, ESV, NIV) restrict volume of quotation under their copyright terms, so they are not used at stub-level coverage here. NASB95 appears only on hand-curated rich passage hubs under Lockman Foundation's fair-use allowance.
The four:
- ASV (American Standard Version, 1901). The basis of the modern critical-text English tradition.
- WEB (World English Bible, contemporary). Public-domain revision in the ASV line, in current English.
- KJV (King James Version, 1611). Reformation-era, Textus Receptus base.
- YLT (Young's Literal Translation, Robert Young, 1862). Hyper-literal preservation of Hebrew and Greek grammar; useful for word-study work even where English reads stiff.
See Bibles for the full per-translation history, translators, textual basis, strengths, and weaknesses.